
Kurdish Documentary Projects Honor Press Martyr Gulistan Tara and Chronicle Liberation History
August 22, 2025
72 Groups Urge UK Prime Minister to Secure Jimmy Lai’s Release on Medical Grounds
August 22, 2025August 22, 2025 – General –
The critical article from FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting) asserts that mainstream Western media have largely parroted Israel’s justifications for deadly strikes in Gaza—sometimes tacitly endorsing the killing of bystanders—without adequately emphasizing that the five journalists killed were not linked to Hamas. Only The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post acknowledged their innocence; most outlets failed to highlight this crucial point, thereby amplifying a narrative that legitimizes civilian casualties as collateral damage.
DAWN MENA’s analysis similarly contends that Western coverage systematically obscures Israeli culpability in Gaza. The article highlights several key issues: omission of Israel as the agent in casualty reports, frequent use of passive voice to soften accountability, skepticism toward Palestinian suffering, and an editorial tendency to dehumanize Palestinian victims. Critically, DAWN MENA frames much of this reporting as unquestioning repetition of state messaging, effectively manufacturing public consent for the violence.
In related commentary, Weave News underscores a broader media failure to contextualize the killings of more than 200 Gaza-based journalists. FAIR’s Emma Lucia Llano critiques outlets such as CNN, The New York Times, Politico, and AP for centering Israeli narratives while delegitimizing pro-Palestinian voices. This selective framing erases the broader pattern of attacks on journalists and shields Israel from scrutiny.
Together, these sources paint a troubling picture: while Western media outlets ostensibly deliver news, their language choices, omissions, and framing often reflect—and reinforce—a partial view aligned with Israeli and U.S. state narratives. This pattern extends from sidelining Palestinian suffering to underreporting or diluting major war crimes, framing them as unilateral or inevitable consequences of security needs.
The consequence is alarming: rather than serving as watchdogs, many media institutions appear to be accomplices in delegitimizing Palestinian grief and erasing the systemic nature of plights faced in Gaza. The articles call for an urgent shift for the media to act with integrity and foreground truth, rather than passive compliance with state-backed messaging around violence and journalist safety.
Reference –
https://institute.aljazeera.net/en/ajr/article/3146
How Western Media Has Manufactured Consent for Atrocities, From Iraq to Gaza
Western Media Manufactured Consent for Israel’s Murder of Palestinian Journalists