Witnessing the Unseen: Journalist Recounts Torture in Israeli Detention
November 1, 2025
Afghan Freelance Journalist Released After Nearly Seven Months Behind Bars
November 1, 2025
November 01, 2025 – Belarus –
In a poignant turn of events, journalist Katsiaryna Andreyeva—who has become a symbol of press freedom under assault in Belarus—continues to serve an eight-year prison sentence, while her partner, Ihar Ilyash, has now also been jailed after remaining in the country to support her. According to the reporting, Andreyeva was arrested in late 2020 following a livestream from Minsk and subsequently convicted on charges of treason and extremism. Ilyash chose not to leave Belarus during the protests and his wife’s detention, and his arrest marks a wider crackdown on independent voices. (Sources: New York Times, Festmore)
Their story illustrates how the Belarusian government’s suppression of dissent extends beyond direct targets to include family members and associates. Ilyash accepted the risk of staying in Belarus to uphold personal loyalty while questioning the state’s narrative of legitimate prosecution of journalists. In doing so, he placed himself at the same peril he had hoped to spare. The case underscores how authoritarian systems conflate support with complicity and weaponize judicial mechanisms to isolate and punish anyone who remains linked to critical media work.
Human-rights monitors caution that the twin imprisonments of Andreyeva and Ilyash are emblematic of a systemic tactic: deprive communities of two complementary voices—the field reporter and the supporting analyst or partner—thereby creating an information vacuum. The broader public consequence is that independent scrutiny of Belarusian politics is hollowed out and media professionals are further intimidated, either into exile or silence.
The couple’s ordeal, therefore, stands for more than personal sacrifice. It symbolizes a sharper deterioration in press freedom within Europe’s last remaining dictatorship, where journalism is treated not as a public service but as political subversion. In this context, Ilyash’s decision to stay becomes a form of resistance but also a tragic illustration of how repressive states expand the circle of fear, making not only reporters but entire families vulnerable.
Reference –
He Stayed in Belarus for His Imprisoned Wife. Now He’s Locked Up, Too.
