Ethiopian Journalists Trapped Between Violence, Political Pressure, and Censorship
August 27, 2025
News Graveyards: How War Dangers Threaten Journalists and the Global News Ecosystem
August 31, 2025
A recent editorial by The Public Source warns of the grave ethical dangers of journalists embedding with military forces accused of genocide. It argues that so-called “propaganda tours” of Gaza orchestrated by the Israeli military are designed not to inform, but to control the narrative, distort facts, and normalise the killing of Palestinian journalists. By agreeing to embed, the piece contends, media outlets accept the trade-off of limited, sanitised access while abandoning independent reporting.
The editorial highlights how embedded coverage often reproduces misinformation, dehumanising language, and factual errors, aligning more with state propaganda than journalistic truth. Instead of scrutinizing violence, these reports risk legitimising it. Crucially, The Public Source stresses the implicit bargain being made: embedded journalists receive protection, while those working independently face heightened threats, often lethal ones. In this way, embedding becomes complicit in the silencing of frontline reporters.
The article calls for a fundamental rethinking of newsroom practices. First, it urges news outlets to reject participation in embeds and to publicly explain their refusal. Second, it insists that Palestinian journalists, who face the greatest risks yet know the terrain intimately, should be hired and protected with the same rights as foreign correspondents. Third, it appeals to individual journalists to decline invitations to military-managed trips. Finally, it advocates for internal resistance, encouraging reporters to voice opposition within their organisations through letters, petitions, and collective action.
According to The Public Source, continuing with embeds under these conditions amounts to complicity in genocide. To safeguard journalistic ethics and resist propaganda, the piece argues, journalists must not only refuse these arrangements but actively confront the industry practices that enable them.
Reference –